Original Note by the Book’s Owner:May 2012 These papers are from the old WECO/ATT Field Engineering “Blue Book” that I had for many years. This data will not be found in general publications, for the most part. The Germans copied most of the book which I retained as classified then, so this stuff, though old data, is still applicable to some extent. KEN |
[OCRer’s Note: The pages in this section are dated from 1 December 1959 to 1 January 1965]
|
.....1951..... |
July (5) |
Office Chief of Ordnance (OCO) requested feasibility study on the defense against formations of aircraft by use of Corporal in conjunction with T33 or Nike-Ajax system. |
July (30) |
Conclusions were reached by Bell Telephone Laboratories (BTL) that neither T33 nor Nike-Ajax were feasible to mate with Corporal. |
|
..... 1952 ..... |
October (9) |
Feasibility study requested by OCO for integration of an atomic warhead Into the Nike-Ajax missile system. This proposal was considered feasible, with reservations, both for the Nike-Ajax missile and for a larger-diameter missile that would make more efficient use of fissionable materials. |
|
..... 1953 ..... |
February |
Nike-Hercules missile study begun under Nike-Ajax Research and Development (R&D) contract. |
March (16) |
BTL-OCO conference held to discuss Nike-Hercules Development Program. R&D Board and the Joint Chiefs of Staff had approved the Army requirements for Nike-Hercules. |
June (19) |
Nike-Hercules program reviewed by Army General Staff G-3 and G-4, Office Chief of Army Field Forces, OCO, Western Electric Co., and Bell Telephone Laboratories at Washington, D. C. Objectives of the Nike-Hercules program were defined as: 1. Development of a new missile to carry a large warhead for use with Nike-Ajax ground guidance and control equipment essentially unmodified. 2. Study of the possibilities of extended range of the Nike-Ajax ground guidance and control equipment to utilize fully the range capabilities of the new missile (Including a possible secondary role as a surface-to-surface system). |
July (16) |
The Nike-Hercules project was authorized by OCO. |
October (20 and 21) |
Contractor representatives made an oral presentation of the results of Nike-Hercules system studies. Principle topics discussed were: 1. Possible configurations for the Nike-Hercules missile. 2. Ground equipment changes for the 25-mile version of the missile. It was estimated that these changes would cost about 9-1/2 per cent of the original Nike-Ajax ground equipment investment. 3. A long-range (50-mile) version of Nike-Hercules. A cost estimate for the program was given as 21 per cent of the original Nike-Ajax investment. 4. Possibilities of incorporating surface-to-surface capabilities. |
|
..... 1954 ..... |
First Quarter |
Authorization given to: 1. Develop a Nike-Hercules missile capable of carrying a 30-inch diameter, 1200-pound payload. 2. Modify a production Nike-Ajax system for testing the 25-mile Nike-Hercules missile at White Sands Missile Range. 3. Continue study on a long-range version of the Nike-Hercules missile. |
February (26) |
Oral survey of the Nike-Hercules system given by the contractor at the Pentagon Building, Washington, D. C. at the request of the Committee on Guided Missiles of the Department of Defense. |
March (23) |
A meeting was held at Ballistic Research Laboratories, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, for the purpose of coordinating the efforts and fixing the responsibilities of the various agencies concerned with the development of the Nike-Hercules cluster warhead. |
April (23) |
Oral report on surface-to-surface role of Nike-Hercules given to Sergeant Steering Committee. |
Second Quarter |
Authorization given to: 1. Develop ground equipment models for extended-range (50-mile) version of Nike-Hercules. 2. Continue study of a single-stage solid propellant missile. 3. Investigate the problem of increased accuracy against ground targets. |
August (17-20) |
Second Nike-Hercules planning conference was held at White Sands Missile Range. |
Third Quarter |
Authorization given to contractor to construct a second experimental model of the Nike-Hercules ground guidance and control equipment for development use at Bell Telephone Laboratories, Whippany, N. J. |
|
..... 1955 ..... |
January |
First R&D firing test. |
April (29) |
Authorization for five prototype systems. |
April (29) |
Authorization for Charlotte missile production. |
November (30) |
Authorization for production of Nike-Hercules ground equipment. |
December |
Completed preparation of manufacturing information. |
White Sands Missile Range Firing Summary |
Twenty Nike-Hercules rounds fired with modified Nike-Ajax ground guidance equipment using Bathtub guidance sections. |
|
..... 1956 ..... |
January |
First Nike-Hercules missile fired from modified Nike-Ajax R ft D system at White Sands Missile Range. |
March |
Delivery of Nike-Hercules model #1 to White Sands Missile Range. |
July (25) |
First Nike-Hercules missile fired using a Nike-Hercules missile system. |
Third Quarter |
First prototype (Santa Monica) missile delivered. |
November (30) |
First Nike-Hercules prototype system (#1) delivered to BTL. |
White Sands Missile Range Firing Summary |
Eight firings with modified Nike-Ajax ground equipment. Four firings with internal programmer. Fifteen firings with Nike-Hercules ground equipment. (All firings with Bathtub guidance sections, except two firings with Stovepipe guidance sections. All system test rounds in surface-to-air mode.) |
|
..... 1957 ..... |
January |
First prototype (#2) Nike-Hercules system delivered to the Army. |
June |
Installation of prototype system at White Sands Missile Range. |
June (30) |
First production system delivered to the Army. " |
White Sands Missile Range Firing Summary |
QB-17 drone kill, 2/6/57, 9000-foot altitude MSL, 20,000-yard range. QF-80 drone kill, 4/25/57, 9000-foot altitude MSL, 25,000-yard range. QB-17 drone kill, 9/11/57, 6300-foot altitude MSL, 50,000-yard range. First solid propellant missile, 3/13/57. First production-type missile fired, 7/12/57, with Nike-Hercules prototype system #1. First successful surface-to-surface round, 8/21/57. First low altitude round, 9/11/57. (Drone destroyed by direct contact.) First article inspection round, 11/27/57. Four surface-to-surface rounds (three successful). Four low-altitude rounds (two successful). Five T45 warhead rounds. Six cellular launcher tests. |
|
---1958--- |
January |
Delivery of first production (Charlotte) missile. |
June |
First tactical deployment. |
White Sands Missile Range Firing Summary |
Three surface-to-surface rounds (all successful). First flight test of Charlotte production missile successful (also first article inspection round), 4/30/58. First T48 warhead round, 4/2/58. First live T48 warhead round, 8/25/58. Project Ammo demonstration round successful, 7/1/58. Series of eight rounds to demonstrate in-flight reliability - five fired from White Sands Missile Range, three fired from McGregor range, (seven successful) 7/58. First Mushroom guidance section flight, 8/8/58, (successful). Army Ordnance Association demonstration round, 10/9/58. First flight against POGO drone successful, 11/6/58, 109,000-foot altitude MSL, 58,000-yard range, T45 warhead (drone killed). First flight against Q-5 drone successful, 11/19/58 , 60,000-foot altitude, 50,000-yard range, T45 warhead (drone killed). |
|
..... 1959 ..... |
January |
HIPAR model at Whippany operational. Snowjet cold weather operational tests (Fort Churchill, Manitoba). |
February |
Experimental Dicke-Fix receivers (ECCM devices) installed in Washington-Baltimore Defense Area.(W-25) |
April |
Ordnance Design Characteristics Inspection of the Improved NIKE-HERCULES System. |
May |
Testing of Mobile Launcher model begun at White Sands Missile Range. |
June |
Quick Reaction Capability Program initiated to introduce electronic counter-counter measure devices into NIKE systems on an expedited basis. |
July |
Analysis of Weapons System Evaluation Group Test No. 3 to evaluate NIKE performance in a heavy ECM environment presented to ARGMA. |
October |
Complete Improved NIKE-HERCULES System model at Whippany operational. |
November |
Development started as part of the HERCULES program on a multichannel ECCM receiver known as the Anti-Jam Display (AJD). |
White Sands Missile Range Firing Summary |
Two low-altitude rounds successfully fired at a grounded B-17 aircraft carcass for evaluation of the T-46 warhead, 1/7/59. First flight against Matador drone successful, 2/6/59, 42,500-foot altitude, 48,000-yard ground range, T-45 warhead (drone killed). QF-80 drone successfully intercepted at an altitude of less than 1,000 feet, 2/18/59, 25,900 yard ground range, T-45 warhead (drone killed). Flight against POGO-Hi target successful, 3/11/59, 156,000-foot altitude, 19,000-yard ground range, T-45 warhead (target killed). Four rounds fired to demonstrate T-46 warhead tactical capability, 5/59 to 9/59 (all successful). First firing from cellular launcher, 6/24/59 (successful). Series of 16 successful rounds to demonstrate surface-to-surface capability — 9 fired from White Sands Missile Range, 7 fired from McGregor range, 7/59 to 9/59. First round fired to test Transponder Control Group parachute recovery system, 8/28/59 (successful). Q-5 drone flying at Mach 2.2 successfully intercepted, 10/16/59 , 38,000-foot altitude, 47,000-yard ground range. |
|
..... 1960 ..... |
February |
Whippany Improved NIKE-HERCULES Model participated in SIOUX ARROW I. |
March |
Proposed concept of mobility for the High Power Acquisition Radar (HIPAR) of the Improved NIKE-HERCULES System was prepared. |
March |
Anti-Jam Display (AJD) equipment installed in the S-band Acquisition Radar (LOPAR) at Whippany and tested in an ECM environment. |
March |
Whippany Improved NIKE-HERCULES Model operated as a Basic NIKE-HERCULES System participated in SIOUX ARROW II. |
March |
Prototype HIPAR accepted with the Improved NIKE-HERCULES Ground Guidance System by Army Ordnance (3/31/60 ). |
April |
Study on Cross-Country NIKE-HERCULES indicated feasibility to mount the Improved NIKE-HERCULES System on self-propelled, Goer-type vehicles. |
April |
Whippany Improved NIKE-HERCULES Model participated in SIOUX ARROW III. |
April |
Study completed which investigated the capabilities of the Basic and Improved NIKE-HERCULES System with certain modifications against attack by certain short-range ballistic missiles. (4/8/60). |
April |
First firings made from the prototype Improved NIKE-HERCULES System at White Sands Missile Range (4/14/60). |
May |
Whippany Improved NIKE-HERCULES Model participated in SIOUX ARROW IV. |
June |
Study made of an abbreviated NIKE-HERCULES System limited only to the surface-to-surface mode of operation. |
June |
Whippany Improved NIKE-HERCULES Model participated in SIOUX ARROW V. |
July |
Installation and checkout of the Manual Anti-Jam Display (AJD) for the Whippany Improved NIKE-HERCULES Model and the White Sands Missile Range Prototype HIPAR concluded. |
November |
Study concerning the feasibility of using a single HIPAR to supply acquisition data to dual NIKE-HERCULES site completed. |
December |
Model kit for experimental installation of the MARK XII. IFF Interrogation System to selected NIKE-AJAX and NIKE-HERCULES Systems completed. |
White Sands Missile Range Firing Summary |
HERCULES Missile (B-281) (**) cold condition to -40°F. successfully intercepted a POGO Target. (2/5/60). [ ** – TWO MISSION MODES: NIKE “B” = HERCULES (NIKE I = AJAX).] Four rounds (B-284, 285, 286, 293) fired in evaluation tests of the new low-altitude functions which were installed in the C-Station Computer. Three rounds were successful. One unsuccessful. (2/26/60, 2/26/60, 3/2/60, 4/26/60). First firings from ZURF occurred; one AJAX Missile (660) fired in a successful system test of ZURF. (3/8/60). One HERCULES round (ZURF) also fired. (4/8/60) Two firings (B-294, ZURF-6) made using cold-conditioned missiles. One successful intercept of a simulated target was made at 130,000 yards range, 64,000 feet altitude MSL. The other round unsuccessful. (5/17/60, 7/15/60). AJAX missile successfully fired to evaluate miss distance indicator to be used in the HIGHBALL target program. (5/21/60) First intercept by HERCULES missile (INH-2), equipped with a conventional T-45 warhead, of a CORPORAL missile at 26,500 feet MSL and a range of 52,000 yards. (6/3/60) HERCULES (INH-4) intercepted a POGO-HT Target at an altitude of 101, 000 feet MSL and a ground range of 52,000 yards. (6/15/60) Six separate HERCULES missiles (INH-3,6,8,9,11,12) fired against six target HERCULES missiles. (6/15/60, 8/12/60, 8/17/60, 9/14/60, 10/6/60, 11/17/60) Three HERCULES rounds (B-299, B-303, B-305) fired for the T-46 firing program. (7/6/60, 7/27/60, 10/12/60) HERCULES missile (INH-5) successfully intercepted a Q-5 drone at 63,000 feet MSL and 72,000 yards ground range. (7/11/60) HERCULES missile (INH-7) fired at a surface target 115,000 yards up-range. (8/17/60) HERCULES missile (INH-10) successfully destroyed an XM-21 drone at the low altitude of 4500 feet above ground level. Ground range was 60,000 feet. (9/14/60) |
|
..... 1961 ..... |
First Quarter |
Strategic Air Command (SAC) developed a Radar Bomb Scoring field kit for use in NIKE Systems. |
January |
HIPAR operating frequency band shifted from 1435 - 1535 MCS to 1427 - 1527 MCS. |
January SHOP
1-2 & 3 |
The design of Electronic Shop 3 (GS-58679) for the Improved NIKE-HERCULES Battery Type IV was placed into production. |
February |
Whippany Model HIPAR modified to incorporate automatic Anti-Jam Display (HAJD) capability. |
May |
Army Rocket and Guided Missile Agency requested that Bell Telephone Laboratories develop an Anti-tactical Ballistic Missile (ATBM) system. |
June |
Feasibility study for operating one HIPAR with two NIKE-HERCULES Systems resulted in a modification kit to provide facilities for integrating a HIPAR into NY-49, a dual Improved NIKE-HERCULES site. |
November |
The "A" Frame Derick for use with the NIKE-HERCULES Field Army System mounted and tested. |
November |
Testing of the Improved NIKE-HERCULES HIPAR Anti-Jam Display (HAJD) successfully completed. |
White Sands Missile Range Firing Summary |
Six HERCULES missiles (SS-1 thru SS-6) fired in support of a surface-to-surface evaluation. (2/28/61 to 4/27/61) HERCULES (INH-15) successfully intercepted Q2A drone at 4500 feet above terrain, 52,000 yards range. (3/10/61) HERCULES round (INH-16) fired in the surface-to-surface mode to 100,000 yards ground range (3/21/61). First GOER launch (B-314) at simulated ASM. (3/30/61) HERCULES (INH-17) with T-45 successfully intercepted ECM-equipped Q2A drone at 27,000 feet above terrain, 96,000 yards range. (4/31/61) Simulated radar-seeking missile target successfully intercepted by a HERCULES Missile (B-316) at 52,000 feet MSL and 58,000 yards ground range. (5/20/61) Round (B-317) fired at a space point, 15,000 feet MSL and 30,000 yards ground range during verification that failsafe switches at station 136 would operate correctly. (6/14/61) First firings from a GOER launcher in the surface-to-surface mode. Two missiles (B-320, 321) fired to a ground range of 154,000 yards. (9/20/61, 10/6/61). HERCULES (INH-13) launched and successfully intercepted an ECM-Equipped XM-21 Drone at 22, 000 feet MSL and 60,000 yards ground range. (11/17/61) HERCULES round (INH-18) equipped with a Miss Distance Indicator (MDI) successfully intercepted a ballistic HIGHBALL II Rocket nose section at an altitude of 20,000 feet (MSL) and ground range of 54,000 yards. (11/20/61) HERCULES round (INH-19) with T45 warhead fired against a Redstone missile under "Operation HARDNOSE ." Intercept of the REDSTONE nose cone not accomplished. (12/5/61) System Test Division (STD) Round 84HE successfully fired at a 66-foot diameter polyethylene balloon. (12/6/61) Two HERCULES missiles (ZURF-13, 14) fired at space points as high altitude ballistic targets for NIKE-ZEUS System Demonstrations (12/12/61, 12/14/61) |
|
..... 1962 ..... |
March |
AOMC authorized the development of the Cross-Country NIKE-HERCULES HIPAR Program (3/6/62). |
March |
The HIPAR staggered PRF modification concluded. |
April |
General Electric began development of mobile HIPAR. |
April |
Static ECCM tests for the TRR completed and documented. (4/16/62) |
June |
Prototype Evaluation of the Improved NIKE-HERCULES System completed and documented. |
June |
Criteria established for an acceptable Cross-Country NIKE-HERCULES power distribution system. (6/26/62) |
June |
The Improved NIKE-HERCULES System implemented with the "Sync-loop" successfully beacon-tracked ZEUS missiles. (6/28/62, 7/31/62, 8/28/62) |
July |
The EFS [HIPAR Electronic Freq Selection] modification installed in the prototype NIKE-HERCULES System at WSMR |
August |
Two brassboard kits of the lin-log receivers installed in the Prototype Improved NIKE-HERCULES System at WSMR for dynamic testing. |
September |
Ordnance documentation for ATBM System completed and approved by AMICOM. (9/28/62) |
(**) September |
Production model of the ATBM modification (less HIPAR) installed in the improved NIKE-HERCULES Prototype System at WSMR. (9/22/62) |
(**) Handwritten Notation: DEPLOYED ALASKA 33
MOD KITS – [UNINTELLIGIBLE CUT OFF BY EDGE OF SCAN] HIPAR ANTENNA MODIFIED (REFLECTORS) TO RAISE THE NOSE OF THE RF BEAM “UP” ABOVE HORIZON FOR HIGH ALTITUDE TARGETS. |
|
November |
Installation of ATBM HIPAR Antenna into the Improved NIKE-HERCULES Prototype System at WSMR complete. |
December |
Development effort to provide Cross-Country capability to the NIKE-HERCULES System discontinued. (12/13/62). |
December |
Interim Mobile HIPAR proposed. (12/15/62) |
White Sands Mi |
ssile Range Firing Summary |
White Sands Missile Range Firing Summary |
Two HERCULES cold rounds (B-324, 325) successfully fired at space points. (1/12/62, 2/9/62) System Test Division (STD) round 85HE successfully fired in the SS mode. (1/29/62) STD round (FS-4) successfully fired at a 36-foot metalized parachute. (3/15/62) HERCULES missile (ZURF-15) fired as high altitude ballistic targets from ZURF for NIKE-ZEUS System demonstrations. (3/28/62) HERCULES missile (B-326) successfully fired in the SS mode at a target 154,000 yards distant. (5/12/62) For evaluation of a new guidance section two HERCULES rounds (B-327, 328) fired on special "roller coaster" trajectories. The rounds were successfully fired at a test point 20,070 yards in range and zero altitude. (6/28/62, 8/16/62) A HERCULES missile (B-330) and two special missiles successfully fired at a space point. Maximum altitudes attained were 280,000, 228,000, and 320,000 feet MSL respectively. (9/10/62, 8/28/62, 8/29/62) |
|
..... 1963 ..... |
February |
Advanced HERCULES study program begun by BTL at the request of AMICOM. |
February |
Effort terminated on development of the NIKE-HERCULES GOER solid state power converter. (2/15/63) |
March |
NIKE-HERCULES participated in Project DOMINIC. [at Johnston Island] |
April |
BTL study on the NIKE-HERCULES Proposed Improvement Program was documented. (4/17/63) |
April |
Design requirements on Interim Mobile HIPAR finalized. (4/19/63) |
April-May |
Flight Tests conducted to evaluate HIPAR MTI Performance. |
May |
Design of vans for use with Mobile HIPAR completed. |
June |
Contractor directed by HERCULES Project Office at RSA to develop specific improvements to TTR, TRR, and HIPAR and conduct feasibility studies on an improved Battery Control Console and use of scan conversion. |
July |
R and D model of "Random/Program Frequency Selector" installed in the HIPAR at WSMR. |
August |
HIPAR Electronic Frequency Selection (EFS) modification kit installed in the WSMR HIPAR. |
November |
Design requirements for the Interim Mobile HIPAR finalized and released. |
White Sands Missile Range Firing Summary |
Instrumented HERCULES cold round (B-331) successfully fired at two space points 80,000 feet MSL, 130,000 yards ground range and 43,000 feet MSL, 167,000 yards ground range. (1/18/63) A HERCULES round (B-332) fired at a surface target of 154, 000 yards ground range to evaluate new missile guidance section components. Missile fail-safe at 123 seconds. (2/7/63) The first missile (ATBM-1) of the NIKE-HERCULES ATBM Prototype System fired at a NIKE-HERCULES missile launched from the ZURF site. Event recorder miss distance was 738 feet. (4/3/63) The nose section of a Pershing missile tracked after being released from a B-47. (5/17/63) The second missile (ATBM-2) of the Prototype NIKE-HERCULES ATBM System intercepted a POGO target at an altitude of 101,000 feet MSL and a ground range of 30,000 yards. (5/11/63) Four HERCULES missiles (ATBM-3, -4, -5, -8) fired from the HERCULES ATBM Prototype System against HERCULES target missiles. (5/17/63, 5/28/63, 6/5/63, 6/5/63) Two HERCULES missiles (ATBM-6, -7) fired from the HERCULES ATBM Prototype System successfully intercepted a space point at a ground range of 80,000 yards and an altitude of 120,000 feet MSL. (6/26/63, 7/19/63) A HERCULES missile (ATBM-9) with a T-45 warhead fired from the HERCULES ATBM site and successfully intercepted a HERCULES target missile at a ground range of 56,000 yards and an altitude of 65,000 feet. This was an Engineering/Service tactical firing test and was conducted by a military operating crew. (9/5/63) HERCULES missile (ATBM-11) with a T-45 warhead successfully fired from the ATBM site against a REDSTONE missile. Intercept occurred at 45, 000 yards ground range and an altitude of 40,000 feet MSL. (10/5/63) Two HERCULES missiles (ATBM-12 and 13) successfully fired from a mobile launcher located 1000 yards from the MTR. (10/11/63 and 10/24/63) First SERGEANT intercept by HERCULES (ATBM-14). (12/9/63) HERCULES missile (ATBM-15) with a T-45 warhead fired against SERGEANT target missile. (12/18 63) |
|
..... 1964 ..... |
March |
The HIPAR portion of the ATBM Prototype Test Program at WSMR completed. |
April |
Douglas report prepared which described the technical and economic aspect of converting to a single-stage missile. |
May |
Development phase of the Mobile HIPAR program completed. |
June |
HIPAR MTI performance investigation completed and documented. |
March |
Contractor testing of Interim Mobile HIPAR System completed. |
April |
Implementation of AJD into WSMR EFS/ATBM HIPAR begun. |
April |
Modifications begun to increase radiated power of HIPAR transmitter. |
White Sands Missile Range Firing Summary |
First TECOM tactical SERGEANT intercept by HERCULES (ATBM-17). Intercept occurred at an altitude of 40,600 feet (MSL)and a ground range of 60, 000 yards. (1/15/64) First intercept of HONEST JOHN by HERCULES (ATBM-18) Intercept at 23,000 yards ground range, altitude 20, 700 feet (MSL) (1/21/64) First TECOM tactical HONEST JOHN intercept by HERCULES (ATBM-19). Intercept at 21,000 yards ground range, altitude 24,000 feet (MSL). (1/30/64) |
[OCRer’s Note: All Pages are dated 1 January 1965]
TRANSMITTER SYSTEM |
EFS HIPAR |
EFS RETROFIT HIPAR |
ATBM HIPAR |
PRF |
400 to 445 pps (fixed with moving target indicator (MTI) trigger) |
Same |
Same |
Frequency range |
1350 to 1450 mc (ten preset crystal-controlled frequencies, selected at battery control console or transmitter control cabinet) |
Same |
Same |
Transmitter Tube type |
Broadband Klystron |
Same |
Same |
Peak power |
10.4
|
5.5 megawatts |
10.4
|
Average power |
26
|
14 kilowatts |
26
|
Pulse width |
6 μsec |
Same |
Same |
Transmitter frequency change time |
Less than 90 Msec (During dead time before transmitted pulse) |
Same |
Same |
TR tube |
|
|
|
Recovery time |
Less than 100 μsec to 3 db down point |
Same |
Same |
Insertion loss |
0.7 db maximum |
Same |
Same |
Duplexer tube |
|
|
|
Recovery time |
105 μs |
Same |
Same |
Insertion loss |
0.3 db maximum (transmitting) |
Same |
Same |
RECEIVING SYSTEM |
|
|
|
Receiver type |
Low-noise broadband parametric amplifiers of the lower sideband, up-converter type (noise figure limit is 3 db) dual channel (main and auxiliary) |
Same |
Same |
System noise figure (including front-end loss and sky noise) |
5.5 db (maximum – either channel) |
Same |
Same |
Receiver bandwidth |
200 kc |
Same |
Same |
Receiver bandwidth |
3 mc |
Same |
Same |
Anti-jam features |
Clutter gated noncoherent MTI, Dicke-Fix, Stagger PRF, fast automatic gain control (FAGC) electronic frequency selection |
Same |
Same |
MDS |
|
|
|
Main receiver |
-114 dbm |
Same |
Same |
MTI receiver |
-112 dbm |
Same |
Same |
Auxiliary receiver |
-102 dbm |
Same |
Same |
Parametric amplifier dynamic range |
|
|
|
Main parametric amplifier |
80 db |
Same |
Same |
Auxiliary parametric amplifier |
80 db |
Same |
Same |
Parametric amplifier gain |
|
|
|
Main amplifier |
45 ±3 db |
Same |
Same |
Auxiliary amplifier |
45 ±3 db |
Same |
Same |
Image rejection |
Spurious signal rejector of 60 db or more at ±10 mc from center frequency |
Same |
Same |
FAGC noise level variation |
Less than 2 db at the signal detector for a 60-db variation at the input of the narrowband amplifier with a recovery period of not more than 100 usec. |
Same |
Same |
STC signal range adjustment |
Suppression adjustable from 0 to 80 db (STC time constant adjustable from 100 to 1500 us) Range adjustable from zero to 40 nautical miles with a reduction of 12 db per octave. |
Same |
Same |
Type of Operation
Coordinate |
Manual |
Aided Manual |
Automatic |
Slew |
ELEVATION |
34 mils/turn |
0.465 - second time constant; 420 mils/second maximum |
700 mils/second maximum |
---- |
AZIMUTH |
34 mils/turn |
0.313-second time constant; 625 mils/second maximum |
700 mils/second maximum |
---- |
RANGE |
200 yards/ turn |
1.15-second time constant; 1000 yards/second maximum |
1600 yards/second maximum |
18,000 yards/ second maximum |
NIKE-HERCULES |
|
Pulse repetition rate |
500 pps (HERCULES mode) |
Frequency range |
8500-9600 mc |
Power requirements (minimum) |
Average power 79. 4 watts |
Pulse width |
0.25 μsec |
Frequency tuning rate |
50 mc/sec |
Antenna type |
Double dish cassigranian parabolic reflector consisting of feed, subdish, and polarizing filter |
Antenna diameter |
92 inches |
Antenna gain |
|
Azimuth and elevation |
37.5 db (midband) |
Sum |
44.1 db (midband) |
Increase over NIKE-AJAX |
4.8 db (midband, sum) |
Antenna polarization |
Vertical |
Antenna efficiency |
54% (measured/ideal, power gain for uniformly illuminated antenna of same size) |
Beamwidth |
1 degree azimuth and elevation |
Receiver noise figure |
11.2 db nominal, with input to converter, (includes noise source correction) |
System noise figure |
12.2 db nominal with input to converter +1 db preconverter losses (includes noise source correction) |
IF preamplifier 60MC |
|
Gain |
24 db |
Noise figure |
3 db |
Tracking rates |
|
Automatic |
Azimuth and elevation |
Manual aided |
Azimuth and elevation 700 mils/second maximum |
Slew Range |
18,000 yards/second |
Presentation range |
200,000 yards |
Improved NIKE-HERCULES |
|
Pulse repetition rate |
500 pps (HERCULES mode) |
Frequency range |
8500-9600 mc |
Power requirements (minimum |
Average power 79.4 watts |
Pulse width |
0.25 μsec |
Frequency tuning rate |
50 mc/sec |
Antenna type |
Double dish cassigranian parabolic reflector consisting of feed, subdish, and polarizing filter |
Antenna diameter |
92 inches |
Antenna gain |
|
Azimuth and elevation |
37.5 db (midband) |
Sum |
44.1 db (midband) |
Antenna polarization |
Vertical |
Beam width |
1 degree azimuth and elevation |
Antenna cross-polarized gain |
At least 26 db below nominal sum mode gain over the band |
Receiver noise figure |
11.2 db nominal with input to converter (includes noise source correction) |
System noise figure |
12.2 db nominal with input to converter +1 db preconverter losses (includes noise source correction) |
ATR recovery time (6163 tube) |
8 μsec maximum |
IF preamplifier |
|
Gain |
24 db |
Noise figure |
3 db |
Receiver dynamic range (including AGC) |
Greater than 95 db |
Main IF amplifier, gain control range |
Greater than 75 db |
Tracking antenna capabilities in high winds (based upon 521 ft-lbs to counter wind torque and 7250 lb antenna weight) |
NIKE-HERCULES |
|
Pulse repetition rate |
500 pps |
Frequency range |
8500-9600 mc |
Power requirements, minimum |
26.9 watts average, 215.3 kilowatts peak |
Power requirements, typical |
250 kilowatts peak |
Pulse width |
0.25 μsec |
Frequency tuning rate |
50 mc/sec |
Antenna type |
Double dish Cassigranian parobolic reflector consisting of feed, subdish, and polarizing filter |
Antenna diameter |
92 inches |
Antenna gain |
|
Azimuth and elevation |
37.5 db (midband) |
Sum |
44.1 db (midband) |
Increase over NIKE-AJAX |
4.8 db (midband, sum) |
Antenna efficiency |
54% (measured/ideal, power gain for uniformly illuminated antenna of same size) |
Antenna polarization |
Vertical |
Beam width |
1 degree azimuth and elevation |
Receiver noise figure |
11.2 db nominal with input to converter (includes noise source correction) |
System noise figure |
12.2 db nominal with input to converter + 1 db preconverter losses (includes noise source correction) |
IF preamplifier |
|
Gain |
24 db |
Noise figure |
3 db |
Tracking rates |
|
Automatic |
Azimuth and elevation 700 mils/second maximum; |
Manual aided |
Azimuth and elevation 700 mils/second maximum; |
Slew |
Azimuth 700 mils/second maximum; |
Handwheel constants |
|
Elevation |
Manual 34 mils/turn; |
Azimuth |
Manual 34 mils/turn; |
Range |
Manual 200 yards/turn; |
Presentation range |
200,000 yards |
Improved And ATBM NIKE-HERCULES |
|
Pulse repetition rate |
400-445 PPS (HIPAR, long and short pulse) |
Frequency range |
8500-9600 mc (X - Band) |
Power requirements, minimum |
Short pulse 25.1 watts average power, 201.1 kw peak power |
Power requirements, typical |
Short pulse 250 kw peak; long pulse 200 kw peak |
Pulse width |
0.25 and 2.5 μsec |
Frequency tuning rate |
50 mc/sec |
Antenna type |
Double dish Cassigranian parabolic reflector consisting of feed, subdish, and polarizing filter |
Antenna diameter |
92 inches |
Antenna gain |
|
Azimuth and elevation |
37.5 db (midband) |
Sum |
44.1 db (midband) |
Beamwidth |
1 degree azimuth and elevation |
Antenna cross-polarization gain |
At least 26 db below nominal sum mode gain over the band |
Antenna polarization |
Vertical |
Receiver noise figure |
10.2 db nominal with input to converter (includes noise source correction) |
System noise figure |
11.2 db nominal with input to converter + 1 db preconverter losses (includes noise source correction) |
Receiver bandwidth |
Long pulse, 0. 8 mc (bandpass filter) Short pulse, 9. 5 mc (main IF amplifier) |
ATR recovery time (6163 tube) |
8 μsec maximum |
IF preamplifier |
|
Gain |
Greater than 25 db |
Noise figure |
2.30 db |
Receiver dynamic range (including AGC |
Greater than 95 db |
Main IF amplifier, gain control range |
Greater than 75 db |
Tracking rates |
|
Automatic |
Azimuth and elevation 700 mils/second maximum; |
Manual aided |
Azimuth and elevation 700 mils/second maximum; |
Slew |
Azimuth 700 mils/second maximum; |
Handwheel constants |
|
Elevation |
Manual 73 mils/turn; |
Azimuth (B Scope) |
Manual 440 mils/turn; |
Azimuth (A Scope) |
Manual 73 mils/turn; |
Range (B Scope) |
Manual 2100 yards/turn; |
Range (A Scope - long pulse) |
Manual 700 yards/turn; |
Range (A Scope - short pulse) |
Manual 175 yards/turn; |
Presentation range |
200,000 yards |
Tracking antenna capabilities in high winds (based upon 521 ft-lbs to counterwind torque and 7250-lb antenna weight) |
|
With an inflated radome (Ed
|
75 mph (approx.) |
With an inflated radome the tracking antenna will safely operate with fairings in winds up to |
90 mph (approx.) |
With uninflated radome the tracking antenna is subject to damage in winds exceeding |
70 mph |
With the radome inflated no damage is sustained in winds up to |
100 mph |