Historical (Created 5
March 2014) |
Editor’s Note: This data has been gathered from sources where they have appeared. Ironically, it seems easier to find this data on Soviet-era weapons, since you could freely talk about the armor protection and firepower of OPFOR equipment that was captured and evaluated in unclassified sources than you could about your own equipment.
Reference
NDIA Small Arms Symposium COL Robert
Radcliffe 20 May 2008 (626~ kb PDF)
The original reference did not have much detail, but from looking up the history of Trijicon's ACOG; adoption of the ACOG on a large scale was around 2005; and since this PDF is dated 2008; it appears to show the capabilities of a 4x magnification combat optic on a infantry rifle.
Infantry Engagement (Benchrest) |
||
Range |
PHit (Raw) |
PHit (Rounded) |
0 |
1.00 |
100% |
100 |
1.00 |
100% |
200 |
1.00 |
100% |
300 |
1.00 |
100% |
400 |
0.9705 |
97% |
500 |
0.9262 |
93% |
600 |
0.8561 |
86% |
Infantry Engagement (Qualification) |
||
Range |
PHit (Raw) |
PHit (Rounded) |
0 |
1.00 |
100% |
100 |
0.9742 |
97% |
200 |
0.7232 |
72% |
300 |
0.4760 |
48% |
400 |
0.3137 |
31% |
500 |
0.2177 |
22% |
600 |
0.1587 |
16% |
Infantry Engagement (Stressed) |
||
Range |
PHit (Raw) |
PHit (Rounded) |
0 |
1.00 |
100% |
100 |
0.4945 |
50% |
200 |
0.1734 |
17% |
300 |
0.0775 |
8% |
400 |
0.0480 |
5% |
500 |
0.0332 |
3% |
600 |
0.0185 |
2% |
When fired in semi automatic mode, the M-16A1 achieves a 50% PHit on a moving man-sized target at 200~ meters and a stationary target at 250m. Automatic fire reduces these ranges by about 100~ meters or more.
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David C. Isby
US Army estimates for a 50% PHit with a six to nine round burst:
Target Type and Mount Type |
Max Range for 50% PHit |
Moving Target from Bipod |
200m |
Man Sized Target, Bipod/Tripod |
600m |
Area target size of infantry fire team, bipod |
800m |
Area target size of infantry fire team, tripod |
1,100m |
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
NO DATA |
83% |
NO DATA |
47% |
31% |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David C. Isby
A Dragunov-armed sniper has the following chances of striking a standing, man-sized target:
Range(m) |
50 |
200 |
300 |
500 |
700 |
800 |
1,000 |
1,600 |
Chance of hit (%) |
95+ |
95 |
90 |
80 |
60 |
50 |
20 |
5 |
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
Target Type |
Max Range for 50% PHit |
Fire Team Sized Target |
350m |
Vehicle |
200m |
Window |
125m |
Bunker Aperture |
50m |
The standard M433 40mm HEDP grenade can penetrate 50mm of RHA or 50 cm of sandbags, and has a casualty radius of 5m for troops in the open.
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by David C. Isby
50% PHit on a man-sized target at 300 meters on a target range. Combat experience has shown that the AKMS is deadly up to 100m, its effectiveness falls off rapidly past that. Over 250m, effects are relatively minimal.
Penetration at close ranges against various materials are:
Material |
Mild Steel |
Concrete |
Sand |
Earth |
Penetration (mm) |
25 |
100 |
150 |
229 |
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
A 6-9-round burst with a PKB (Pintle AAMG mount) has a 50% chance of hitting a stationary, fire-team-sized target at 1,000m under firing range conditions.
A 6-9-round burst with a PKM (Squad LMG) has a 50% chance of hitting a stationary, fire-team-sized target at 800m under firing range conditions, or a stationary standing man at 550 meters.
A PKM's chances of hitting a moving, man-sized target in the open with a 6-9-round burst (range and accuracy approximate to ±10%) are:
Range (m) |
50 |
100 |
175 |
250 |
500 |
750 |
1,000 |
Chance of hit |
97% |
83% |
69% |
56% |
42% |
31% |
3% |
With a six-nine-round burst a PK Series has the following chances of damaging an unarmoured, stationary vehicle:
Range (m) |
100 |
200 |
300 |
500 |
800 |
1,000 |
Chance (%) |
95 |
70 |
60 |
45 |
35 |
15 |
If hits are scored, the target will be destroyed approximately 65% of the time.
Penetration at close ranges against various materials are:
Material |
Mild Steel |
Concrete |
Sand |
Earth |
Penetration (mm) |
37 |
127 |
178 |
280 |
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
US Army estimates for a 50% PHit with a nine to fifteen round burst from a stationary vehicle mount
Target Type |
Max Range for 50% PHit |
Man Sized Target |
500m |
Vehicle |
800m |
Fire Team Sized Target |
1,000m |
If the vehicle was moving, longer bursts of 15 to 30 rounds would be fired and the weapon “walked” onto the target, resulting in the following hit probabilities:
Target Type |
Range |
PHit Probability |
Fire Team Sized Target |
300m |
50% |
Squad Sized Target |
500m |
30% |
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
NO DATA |
97% |
NO DATA |
56% |
39% |
14% |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David C. Isby
US Army simulator tests indicate that a pintle-mounted DShKM on top of a tank has the following chances of shooting down an AH-1 Cobra helicopter gun-ship, based on a 6-8sec burst at a crossing helicopter exposed for 20 sec:
Range (m) |
500 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
Chance of kill (%) |
10 |
10 |
5 |
US Army estimates give a DShKM the following chances of scoring a "hit" (which could entail more than one round striking the target) with a 9-15-round burst on a vehicle standing in the open:
Range(m) |
100 |
200 |
300 |
500 |
800 |
1,000 |
Chance (%) |
95 |
80 |
70 |
50 |
40 |
20 |
65% of the unarmoured vehicles hit will be killed, as will 30% of the armoured vehicles hit, if their armour can be penetrated.
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
Notes: US tests of captured RPG-7s revealed that even well trained gunners are normally 10-15% off in estimating the range, greatly reducing first-round accuracy. Aiming the RPG-7 is even more difficult because the PG-7 projectile is seriously affected by crosswinds in flight. The reaction effect of its rocket motor turns it into the wind, and the RPG-7 gunner must estimate the direction and speed of the wind as well as that of the target.
Hit probability [ of RPG-7] |
||||||
Type of target |
Range (metres) |
|||||
50 |
100 |
200 |
300 |
400 |
500 |
|
1st round, exposed, stationary |
98% |
91 % |
52% |
27% |
10% |
5% |
1st round, hull-down |
80% |
70% |
20% |
9% |
3% |
– |
2nd round, exposed, stationary |
98% |
95% |
78% |
56% |
38% |
25% |
2nd round, exposed, moving |
97% |
90% |
55% |
27% |
16% |
6% |
2nd round, hull-down |
80% |
68% |
35% |
18% |
10% |
– |
The target is an M60A1 tank moving at 16km/h at an angle of 30° from the RPG-7, wind at 11km/h. |
A PG-7 projectile can punch a 5cm hole through the equivalent of 280mm of armour, pushing hot metal fragments and the jet streaming from the shaped charge into the target, followed by the copper slug produced from the projectile liner, which will ricochet inside a tank and often go through APCs. Armour penetration varies with range and individual grenades. Some have penetrated over 300mm of armour. At under 300m range, however, the PG-7's speed reduces the penetration of its shaped charge.
Range (m) |
50 |
100 |
150 |
200 |
250 |
300 |
350 |
400 |
450 |
500 |
Penetration (mm) |
265 |
220 |
225 |
240 |
265 |
280 |
280 |
280 |
285 |
290 |
If a PG-7 hits an M60A1 it has a 40% chance of knocking it out, but only a 5% chance of completely destroying it.
Although it does not have an anti-personnel round, the RPG-7 is effective against buildings and fortifications. It can penetrate 23cm of sandbags, 45.7cm of reinforced concrete, and 152.4cm of earth and log bunker. The PG-7 can plough through brick and concrete walls, leaving a five-centimetre hole, but it will not knock them down.
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
Range (metres) |
||||||
300 |
500 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
2,500 |
3,000 |
0% |
54% |
73% |
82% |
87% |
89% |
0% |
Represents the approximate probability of a hit against a stationary M60A1 tank from a stationary ATGM launcher (ATGMs cannot be fired on the move). If a AT-1 scores a hit on a M60A1, it has a 67% chance of knocking it out. |
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
Range (metres) |
||||||
300 |
500 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
2,500 |
3,000 |
0% |
0% |
90% |
90% |
90% |
90% |
90% |
Represents the approximate probability of a hit against a stationary M60A1 tank from a stationary ATGM launcher (ATGMs cannot be fired on the move). Figures are estimates. If a AT-2 scores a hit on a M60A1, it has a 67% chance of knocking it out. |
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
Range (metres) |
||||||
300 |
500 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
2,500 |
3,000 |
25% |
60% |
87% |
87% |
87% |
87% |
87% |
Represents the approximate probability of a hit against a stationary M60A1 tank from a stationary ATGM launcher (ATGMs cannot be fired on the move). If a AT-3 scores a hit on a M60A1, it has a 69% chance of knocking it out. |
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at
stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
nil |
67% |
No Data |
78% |
78% |
78% |
78% |
78% |
75% |
75% |
No Data |
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at
stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
nil |
67% |
75% |
90% |
90% |
90% |
90% |
90% |
90% |
90% |
90% |
Armor Penetration (mm) |
500 mm, any range |
||||||||||
PKill against T-62 MBT |
90% |
Notes: The two estimates are based on differing allowances for crew performance degradation in combat. Minimum range of TOW is 65m.
References
Weapons
and Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
Armies of
NATO’s Central Front by David Isby
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at
stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
nil |
72% |
No Data |
90% |
90% |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at
stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
nil |
nil |
nil |
72% |
72% |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
Armor Penetration (mm) |
500 mm, any range |
||||||||||
PKill against T-62 MBT |
80% |
Notes: The two estimates are based on differing allowances for crew performance degradation in combat. Also, the second estimate of Dragon accuracy increases the minimum range from 75m to 300m.
References
Weapons
and Tactics of the Soviet Army
by David Isby
Armies of NATO’s Central Front
by David Isby
HEAT Round(s) |
|||||||||||
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
No Data |
83% |
No Data |
67% |
47% |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
Armor Penetration (mm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PKill against T-62 MBT |
64% |
HEPT ( High-explosive plastic tracer) Round(s) |
|||||||||||
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
No Data |
83% |
No Data |
64% |
44% |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
Armor Penetration (mm) |
|
Note: Minimum range is 12 meters.
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David Isby
HEAT Round(s) |
|||||||||||
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
No Data |
83% |
No Data |
14% |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
Armor Penetration (mm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PKill against T-62 MBT |
50% |
Note: Minimum range is 12 meters.
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David Isby
HEAT Round(s) |
|||||||||||
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
97% |
94% |
17% |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
Armor Penetration (mm) |
325 mm, any range |
||||||||||
PKill against T-62 MBT |
33% |
Note: Minimum range is 15 meters.
References
Weapons
and Tactics of the Soviet Army
by David Isby
Armies of NATO’s Central Front
by David Isby
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
No Data |
94% |
No Data |
50% |
3% |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
Armor Penetration (mm) |
|
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David Isby
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
No Data |
94% |
No Data |
56% |
8% |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
Armor Penetration (mm) |
|
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David Isby
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
No Data |
94% |
No Data |
61% |
14% |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
nil |
Armor Penetration (mm) |
|
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David Isby
HAWK: 75~ fired in Yom Kippur war for 22 to 25 aircraft destroyed. (0.313 PKill)
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David C. Isby
Although the weapon was designed for use against high-performance jet aircraft, US Army figures based on tests of captured ZSU-23-4s show that it is also extremely effective against helicopters. The probability of destroying an AH-1 Cobra helicopter gunship with a 40-round burst (10 rounds per barrel) from a stationary ZSU-23-4 is:
Range (m) |
500 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
2500 |
3000 |
AH-1 manoeuvring |
80% |
48% |
30% |
18% |
8% |
4% |
AH-1 hovering |
80% |
53% |
36% |
27% |
18% |
15% |
The US Army estimates that a 5-10 rounds per barrel burst from a ZSU-23-4 would have the following chances of hitting a stationary vehicle:
Range (m) |
50 |
100 |
175 |
250 |
500 |
750 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
Chance of hit |
97% |
97% |
97% |
78% |
61% |
56% |
47% |
31% |
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
System |
PKill (fighter) |
PKill (bomber) |
Way of firing |
Nike-Hercules |
53% |
42% |
Shoot-look-shoot |
Improved Hawk |
91% |
48% |
Shoot-shoot-look-shoot |
Chapparal |
50% (80%) |
— |
Shoot-new target-shoot |
Vulcan |
7% |
— |
Four 60-round bursts |
Redeye |
68% |
— |
Shoot-new target-shoot |
Stinger |
(60%) |
— |
Shoot-new target-shoot |
Roland II |
(70%) |
— |
— |
Rapier |
(70%) |
— |
— |
Crotale |
(82%) |
— |
— |
Patriot |
(80%) |
— |
— |
1 Nike figures assume a 20km slant range for the fighter, 70km for the bomber. 2 Hawk and Vulcan figures are for a mission kill rather than a K-Kill. 3 Figures in parentheses are based on a second computer model. 4 All figures are for single-shot kill probability in an environment free of ECM and infra-red countermeasures. |
References
Armies of
NATO’s Central Front by David C. Isby
Weapon Type |
Single
Pass PKill |
Comparative Reliability |
Overall Kill Probability Per Weapon (Computed) |
Mk
82 |
26% |
85% |
0.221 |
Mk
84 |
33% |
85% |
0.2805 |
Maverick |
87% |
89% |
0.7743 |
Aircraft Guns |
No Data |
98% |
Cannot Compute |
Iron
Bombs / |
No Data |
91% |
Cannot Compute |
TOW ATGM (Helicopter) |
80% (Vietnam) |
92% |
Cannot Compute |
SS-11
ATGM |
80%
(Range) |
|
|
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by David C. Isby
Type of Rangefinder |
US Army estimates of Rangefinder accuracy on targets at 1,500m |
Stereoscopic Rangefinder |
±280 meters |
Coincidence Rangefinder |
±30~ meters |
Laser Rangefinder |
±5 to 15 meters |
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David C. Isby
Tank Era |
Rounds Fired to obtain 50% Probability |
76mm WWII Tank |
13 |
90mm 1950s/1960s Tank |
3 |
105mm 1970s Tank |
1 |
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David C. Isby
The influence of fire-control systems and optics can be seen in these comparisons of a Belgian M48 tank using different types of rangefinder with its 90mm gun:
Rangefinder Type |
Range |
||
500m |
1,000m |
2,000m |
|
Laser |
98% |
86% |
34% |
Stereo Coincidence |
97% |
70% |
14% |
Stadia Reticle |
98% |
34.5% |
4% |
The figures show the probability of hit by a stationary tank against a stationary 2.3m square target.
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
APDS Round(s) |
|||||||||||
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
97% |
97% |
94% |
94% |
86% |
61% |
44% |
25% |
8.00% |
l + % |
nil |
Armor Penetration (mm) |
300 |
Not |
Not |
Not |
275 |
200 |
225 |
200 |
175 |
Not |
Not |
PKill against T-62 MBT |
54% |
HEAT Round(s) |
|||||||||||
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
97% |
94% |
92% |
89% |
69% |
50% |
28% |
17% |
3% |
nil |
nil |
Armor Penetration (mm) |
425 mm, any range |
||||||||||
PKill against T-62 MBT |
75% |
HEP Round(s) |
|||||||||||
Statistic |
Range (metres) |
||||||||||
50 |
100 |
250 |
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
3500 |
3750 |
|
Probability of Hit (Stationary weapon firing at stationary 2.3m2 vehicle target. |
97% |
94% |
92% |
89% |
56% |
47% |
28% |
17% |
3% |
nil |
nil |
PKill against T-62 MBT |
81% |
References
Weapons
and Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David Isby
The effectiveness of the Sagger and PKT on the BMP is approximately the same as that of the standard versions. The probability of a hit by a 73mm gun fired from a stationary BMP against a stationary M60A1 in the open, first round on target, according to US Army figures, is:
Range (metres) |
50 |
100 |
175 |
250 |
500 |
800 |
1,000 |
1,300 |
1,800 |
Probability |
97% |
89% |
89% |
83% |
64% |
50% |
40% |
28% |
24%(?) |
The relatively high accuracy for 1,800m range is unusual, considering that the sight is only calibrated to 1,300m. The shell used against armoured vehicles would be HEAT, capable of penetrating 400mm of armour. If a hit is scored, the US Army estimates that a 73mm HEAT round has a 33% chance of killing an M60A1 and a 50% chance of killing an M113 APC.
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
The following table gives the probability of a first-round hit from a standing PT-76 against a standing AFV:
Ammunition |
Range (metres) |
|||||||||
50 |
100 |
175 |
250 |
500 |
750 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
2,500 |
|
HVAP BR-354P |
97% |
89% |
89% |
89% |
86% |
88% |
68% |
39% |
17% |
0% |
HEAT |
97% |
83% |
83% |
83% |
83% |
75% |
61% |
33% |
3% |
0% |
These figures are from the US Army, which has had a number of PT-76s for many years.
Penetration against flat, vertical steel armour |
||||
Ammunition |
Range (metres) |
|||
500 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
|
APHE |
69mm |
61mm |
54mm |
48mm |
HVAP BR-354P |
92mm |
58mm |
? |
? |
The older, spin-stabilised BP-353 or UBP-350M HEAT rounds could penetrate 120mm of oblique, homogeneous armour at any range; the newer fin-stabilised BK-354R can penetrate 280mm.
The HEAT or HVAP round has approximately a 33% chance of killing an M60A1 tank and a 50% chance of killing a lightly armoured vehicle such as an M113 or M109.
At close range the 76mm gun can breach the walls of all but the most impregnable buildings in four (for light buildings) to nine hits.
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
Performance (85mm HVAP ammunition) |
||||||
Round |
Type |
Weight (Kg) |
Muzzle velocity (m/sec) |
Armour penetration and velocity (m/sec) |
||
500m |
1,000m |
1,500m |
||||
BR-365P |
HVAP |
4.99 |
1,050 |
139mm (895) |
108mm (751) |
83mm (623) |
BR-367 |
APC-T |
9.20 |
805 |
135mm (750) |
122mm (697) |
109mm (646) |
BR-367P |
HVAP |
5.35 |
1,020 |
213mm (909) |
1 78mm (803) |
148mm (705) |
Performance (85mm APHE Ammunition) |
|||||||
Round |
Weight (Kg) |
Muzzle velocity (m/sec) |
Armor penetration |
||||
500m |
1,000m |
1,500m |
2,000m |
2,500m |
|||
BR-365 |
9.2 |
792 |
111 mm |
102mm |
93mm |
85mm |
78mm |
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
Accuracy |
|||||
Ammunition |
Range (metres) |
||||
500 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
2,500 |
|
BR-412 APC-T |
90% |
50% |
33% |
8% |
4% |
BK-5M HEAT |
84% |
43% |
25% |
2% |
– |
Soviet "textbook" estimates of the 100mm gun's accuracy are much higher. Theoretically, a gun using a BR-412B APHE round against a halted enemy tank 2.7m high and 3.6m long should have a 77% chance of hitting its target at 1,800m range. Actual accuracy would doubtless be much less in combat conditions. Maximum indirect-fire range requires a 28° slope.
Penetration |
||||
Ammunition |
Range (metres) |
|||
500 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
|
BR-412 APC-T |
155 |
135 |
117 |
100 |
BM-6 HVAPDS |
– |
264 |
– |
237 |
BK-5M HEAT |
380mm at any range |
|||
BR-412B APC-T |
– |
171 |
– |
146 |
BR-412D APC-T |
– |
175 |
– |
156 |
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
The US Army obtained many T-62s from Israel after the 1973 war and so has been able to test its effectiveness, both theoretically and in the field. According to these tests and studies, the probability of a stationary T-62 hitting an M60A1-size target is:
Ammunition |
Shot at target |
Range-finder |
Target |
Range (metres) |
|||||
500 |
1000 |
1500 |
2000 |
2500 |
3000 |
||||
BR-5 HVAPFSDS |
1st |
stadia |
static |
98% |
79% |
50% |
27% |
14% |
8% |
BR-5 HVAPFSDS |
2nd |
stadia |
static |
98% |
84% |
66% |
51% |
40% |
32% |
BR-5 HVAPFSDS |
1st |
laser |
static |
98% |
86% |
60% |
43% |
20% |
10% |
BR-5 HVAPFSDS |
1st |
stadia |
moving |
94% |
75% |
33% |
19% |
8% |
nil |
BK-4M HEAT |
1st |
stadia |
static |
89% |
69% |
33% |
11% |
3% |
3% |
BK-4M HEAT |
1st |
stadia |
moving |
75% |
30% |
5% |
nil |
nil |
nil |
Moving targets are assumed to be at 24km/h at a 30° angle to the T-62. Second rounds on target assume a first-round hit. If an M60A1 is hit, a BR-5 round has a 71% kill probability and a BK-4M has a 75% kill probability. Figures using a laser rangefinder are unofficial estimates based on Western equipment.
Armour penetration (BR-5 HVAPFSDS, 0° obliquity): |
||||||
Range (m) |
500 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
2,500 |
3,000 |
Armour (mm) |
350 |
300 |
285 |
270 |
245 |
215 |
Armour penetration (BK-4M HEAT): |
||||||
Range (m) |
500 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
2,500 |
3,000 |
Armour (mm) |
432mm regardless of range. |
|||||
All figures assume steel armour at 0° incidence. |
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
Ammunition |
Range (metres) |
|||||
500 |
1,000 |
1,500 |
2,000 |
2,500 |
3,000 |
|
HVAPCFSDS |
98% |
94% |
70-80% |
50-60% |
40+% |
35+% |
The figures represent the probability of hitting with the first shot on target at a stationary tank, assuming the laser rangefinder and computer to be as effective as those in Western tanks.
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby
Effective Damage Radius (Tanks): 120m
Effective
Damage Radius (Personnel): 340m
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David C. Isby
Weapon |
Munition |
Range (km) |
PER piece |
PED piece |
PER battery |
PED battery |
81mm mortar |
HE |
2 |
25.0 |
4.0 |
30.0 |
18.0 |
4.2in mortar |
HE |
4 |
29.0 |
3.0 |
62.0 |
28.0 |
M102 105mm |
HE |
7 |
15.5 |
4.0 |
72.8 |
29.0 |
M102 105mm |
ICM |
7 |
23.0 |
4.0 |
86.0 |
32.0 |
M109A1 155mm |
HE |
10 |
29.0 |
4.0 |
125.0 |
40.0 |
M109A1 155mm |
ICM |
10 |
33.0 |
1.0 |
125.0 |
40.0 |
M110 8in |
HE |
14 |
41.8 |
4.0 |
112.0 |
50.6 |
M110 8in |
ICM |
14 |
36.0 |
2.0 |
141.0 |
50.0 |
Lance |
ICM |
50 |
88.0 |
88.0 |
84.0 |
84.0 |
These figures show the projectile error range (PER) and projectile error deflection (PED) in metres for indirect fire by some standard NATO artillery pieces. Figures are given for both individual pieces and full batteries, engaging targets at the range shown. |
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David C. Isby
Calibre |
HE-PD Lethal Area (ft2) |
HE-VT Lethal Area (ft2) |
HE-ICM Lethal Area (ft2) |
60mm Mortar |
1,132 |
1,627 |
Not Available in 1980s for this calibre |
81mm Mortar |
3,307 |
4,091 |
Not Available in 1980s for this calibre |
107mm Mortar |
1,461 |
7,270 |
Not Available in 1980s for this calibre |
120mm Mortar |
4,263 |
9,854 |
Not Available in 1980s for this calibre |
105mm Howitzer |
2,924 |
5,920 |
12,080 |
155mm Howitzer |
2,230 |
4,200 |
25,800 |
203mm Howitzer |
3,269 |
4,200 |
44,865 |
HE-PD
– Point Detonating Fuze for use on troops with overhead
cover. |
References
Armies
of NATO’s Central Front by
David C. Isby
All Soviet artillery retains a direct-fire anti-tank capability, and 5% of each Soviet artillery unit of fire is antitank ammunition. But these weapons arc only effective at short range, as shown by these US Army figures assessing the probability of a hit against a stationary vehicle:
Weapon |
Ammunition |
Range (metres) |
|||||
50 |
100 |
175 |
250 |
500 |
750 + |
||
122mm D-30 |
BK-6M HEAT |
97% |
94% |
89% |
72% |
50% |
31% |
152mm D-20 |
BR-472 APHE |
97% |
94% |
92% |
75% |
56% |
39% |
If a hit is scored, a 122mm HEAT round has approximately a 53 % chance of killing an M60 and a 93 % chance of killing an M113, while a 152mm APHE round, equally approximately, has a 56% and an 83% chance of killing an M60 and M113 respectively.
References
Weapons and
Tactics of the Soviet Army by David Isby