Historical Procurement
Timescales
|
If no specific date of the month is given, then I assume that the first flight, contract, etc is given on the 15th of that month for counting reasons.
“Peak Production Period” for combat aircraft/vehicles is defined as the period when the top 40% of all production is built. It's also a good “rule of thumb” for estimating when that type would be in true mass service. To find this, the equation [ =B37>=PERCENTILE($B$37:$B$74,0.6) ] is used in Excel spreadsheets.
The tank stuff here was inspired by a post by "AlexH" on the Dupuy Institute's forum (HERE) (ARCHIVED TXT VERSION).
M3 Grant/Lee SeriesReference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
13. Jun. 1940 |
0 |
Characteristics of a tank incorporating the new requirements needed as a result of the changes in Europe in Spring 1940 outlined in OCM 15889. |
11. Jul. 1940 |
28 |
“Paper Tank” standardized as Medium Tank M3, due to the urgency of the world situation. |
26. Aug. 1940 |
74 |
Wooden Mockup shown to the Tank Committee at Aberdeen. |
1. Feb. 1941 |
233 |
Detail Design of initial M3 design finished. |
13. Mar. 1941 |
273 |
First M3 pilot hull moves under it's own power at Rock Island Arsenal, before being shipped on 14 March 1941 to Aberdeen Proving Ground. |
1. Nov. 1941 |
281 |
M3 Pilot Hull arrives at Aberdeen and is mated to a turret for preliminary testing |
5. May. 1941 |
326 |
First Production Pilot M3 arrives at Aberdeen Proving Ground from Detroit Tank Arsenal |
15. Jul. 1941 |
397 |
First M3 Grant built for the British completed by Pressed Steel Car Company. |
Jan 1942 |
581 |
M3 monthly production reaches 545 tanks that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
June 1942 |
732 |
Peak of M3 Production at 738 tanks that month. |
M4 (75mm) Sherman Medium TankReference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
31. Aug. 1940 |
0 |
Detailed Characteristics for a medium tank to succeed the M3 submitted by Ordnance Department for manufacturers. |
1. Feb. 1941 |
154 |
Detail design of the M3 successor begun. Up to this point, the Aberdeen design team has been busy finishing up the production drawings for the M3 Medium Tank during the Fall and Winter of 1940. |
18. Apr. 1941 |
230 |
US Armored Force Board chooses simplest of five detailed designs submitted by Aberdeen, and designates it the T6. |
2. Sep. 1941 |
367 |
T6 Pilot completed and inspected by Armored Force and Ordnance representatives. |
5. Sep. 1941 |
370 |
Ordnance committee recommends that the T6 Pilot (after necessary changes) be standardized as the M4 Medium Tank. |
November 1941 |
441 |
Production Pilot construction begun by manufacturers. |
February 1942 |
533 |
M4A1 production begins at Lima Locomotive Works. |
September 1942 |
745 |
M4 monthly production reaches 1,259 tanks that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
December 1942 |
836 |
Peak of M4 75mm Production at 2,433 tanks that month. |
M4 (76mm) Sherman Medium TankReference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
11. Sep. 1941 |
0 |
OCM 17202 requires that the gun shield and turret of the M4 Medium tank be capable of mounting the 75mm M3, a 105mm Howitzer, or a 3-Inch (76.2mm) gun. |
1. Aug. 1942 |
324 |
76mm Gun T1 shipped to Aberdeen for tests with modified M4s. Tests conclude that the 76mm Gun T1 is satisfactory for use with M4 series. |
17. Aug. 1942 |
340 |
Ordnance Committee recommends that the M4 with 76mm gun be classified as “substitute standard” and that the 76mm T1 gun be standardized as the 76mm M1 gun. |
2. Feb. 1943 |
509 |
M4A1(76M1) tank arrives at Fort Knox for service tests. |
5. Apr. 1943 |
571 |
Final report on M4A1(76M1) service tests submitted by Fort Knox, in which the 76mm tank is rejected by the Armored Force. |
3. May. 1943 |
599 |
Ordnance committee cancels the classification of “substitute standard” for the M4A1(76M1), and recommends manufacture of an improved pilot (M4E6) mounting the turret of the T20 medium tank. |
July 1943 |
672 |
M4E6 Pilot #2 arrives at Aberdeen Proving Ground before being sent to Ft. Knox. A major redesign of Sherman begins, with it referred to as “Medium Tank, M4 Series (Ultimate Design)” to standardize parts and stowage across all the models. |
17. Aug. 1943 |
705 |
Armored Board recommends acceptance and production of tanks based on the M4E6 Pilot. |
Jan 1944 |
856 |
First 76mm Sherman (a M4A1) comes off the production line at Pressed Steel Car Company. |
June 1944 |
1008 |
M4 (76mm) monthly production reaches 724 tanks that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
December 1944 |
1191 |
Peak of M4 (76mm) Production at 1,153 tanks that month. |
NOTES: The 76mm upgunning process went through two complete cycles, the first unsuccessful attempt taking 19 months and the second successful attempt taking 8.5 months. |
T14 Assault TankReference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
30. Mar. 1942 |
0 |
Requirement for a special assault tank established at a conference between the Chief of Ordnance and the British Tank Mission. |
May 1942 |
46 |
Detailed military characteristics issued, along with designation Assault Tank, T14. |
June 1942 |
77 |
Aberdeen completes preliminary drawings, and assigns ALCO the task of finishing the design. |
April 1943 |
381 |
Detail design work finished at ALCO. |
July 1943 |
472 |
Pilot #1 shipped to Aberdeen by ALCO. |
August 1943 |
503 |
Pilot #2 shipped to Aberdeen by ALCO. Tests at Aberdeen show difficulties and Aberdeen recommends that no further consideration be given to T14. |
14. Dec. 1944 |
990 |
OCM 26038 officially cancels program. |
M4A3 (Ford GAA) Sherman Medium TankReference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
January 1942 |
0 |
Ordnance Committee authorizes the use of the new Ford GAA in the Sherman and designates the GAA powered version the M4A3. At the same time, orders the first GAA for military use. |
April 1942 |
90 |
First “Ford Tank Engine” produced at the Lincoln plant in Detroit. |
Late May 1942 |
125 |
Ford completes manufacture of three pilot models of the M4A3 and sends them to the GM Proving Grounds. |
June 1942 |
151 |
Production of the M4A3 begins at Ford. |
M3 Stuart Light TankReference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
3. Jun. 1940 |
0 |
OCM 15864 recommends that the light tanks procured during FY1941 have 1.5” of armor. |
5 July 1940 |
32 |
OCM 15932 designates the improved vehicle as the Light Tank M3. |
March 1941 |
285 |
M3 replaces M2A4 on production line at American Car & Foundry. |
April 1942 |
681 |
M3 monthly production reaches 544 tanks that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
Dec 1942 |
925 |
Peak of M3 Production at 1,587 vehicles. |
M5 Stuart Light TankReference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
6. Jun. 1941 |
0 |
OCM 16837 authorizes the installation of two Cadillac engines and automatic transmission in the M3 light tank as the M3E2. |
13 Nov 41 |
160 |
OCM 17428 assigns designation Light Tank, M4 to the production M3E2. |
21 Nov 1941 |
168 |
OCM 17451 combines the Cadillac re-engine program (M3E2/M4) with the M3A1E1 hull re-design project, turning the M3E2 into the M3E3. |
February 1942 |
254 |
OCM 17827 redesignates Light Tank, M4 as the Light Tank, M5 to avoid confusion with Medium Tank, M4. |
19 March 1942 |
286 |
M3E3 / M5 Pilot at Aberdeen Proving Grounds. |
April 1942 |
313 |
M5 production begins at Cadillac. |
September 42 |
466 |
M5 monthly production reaches 449 tanks that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
December 1942 |
557 |
Peak of M5 Production at 737 vehicles. |
M24 Chaffee Light TankReference: Note: In this case, a lot of “pre-development” work on light tanks had been done by the T7/M7 program. |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
March 1943 |
0 |
Ordnance Committee listed characteristics of a light tank using the power train of the M5 light tank, but with the 75mm Gun system developed during the T7 Light/Medium tank program. |
2 Sep 1943 |
171 |
OCM 21446 type classifies the T24 as limited procurement and directs that 1,000 T24 be built in place of 1,000 M5 Light Tanks. |
15 Oct 1943 |
214 |
First T24 pilot shipped to Aberdeen Proving Ground for testing. |
April 1944 |
397 |
Production of T24 begins at Cadillac. |
22 June 1944 |
465 |
OCM 24175 recommends standardization of T24 as Light Tank, M24. |
November 1944 |
611 |
M24 monthly production reaches 417 tanks that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
December 1944 |
641 |
Peak of M24 Production at 549 vehicles. |
M6 Heavy TankReference: Note: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
20 May 1940 |
0 |
Chief of Infantry recommends a requirement be established for a heavy tank and that it weigh between 50-80 tons. |
22 May 1940 |
2 |
OCM 15842 recommends a development program be initiated for a 50 ton multi-turreted tank (2 x 75mm turrets and 1 x 37mm and 1 x 20mm turrets). |
11 July 1940 |
52 |
Proposed vehicle approved and designated as Heavy Tank, T1. |
August 1940 |
87 |
Contract signed with Baldwin Locomotive Works for production of a pilot heavy tank followed by 50 production models. |
24 October 1940 |
157 |
OCM 16200 is first mention of revised arrangement with a single turret mounting a 3” AA gun and a 37mm coaxial cannon. |
August 1941 |
452 |
Testing of T1E2 pilot at BLW begins. |
8 December 1941 |
597 |
T1E2 Pilot officially presented to Ordnance Department at the BLW Plant. |
13 April 1942 |
693 |
OCM 18059 recommends standardization of T1E2 as M6 and T1E3 as M6A1. Number of tanks to be ordered reduced from 1,084 to 115. |
26 May 1942 |
736 |
Standardization of M6 and M6A1 approved. |
7 Dec 1942 |
931 |
General Jacob Devers, CG AGF states that there is no need for the M6 due to it's great weight. Program canceled. |
December 1942 |
939 |
First production M6 accepted at BLW. |
March 1943 |
1029 |
M6 monthly production reaches 3 tanks that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
October 1943 |
1243 |
Peak of M6 production, with 6 tanks accepted this month. |
T23 / M27 Medium Tank
|
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
Spring 1942 |
0 |
GEN Barnes and COL Colby propose a new medium tank utilizing the “space engineering” concept, the low-profile Ford GAN tank engine, and the 76mm Gun T1. |
May 1942 |
30 |
Mockup of the proposed tank studied by the Product Study Division of General Motors. Ordnance Comittee designates the concept as the T20 medium tank and approves construction of two pilots. |
January 1943 |
275 |
T23 Pilot #1 completed by General Electric. |
May 1943 |
395 |
250 x T23 tanks ordered by Ordnance Department, of which 40 were requested to mount a 90mm Gun (T25) and 10 were to mount both the 90mm Gun, plus heavier armor (T26). |
July 1943 |
456 |
Proposed to standardize the T23E3 as the Medium Tank M27, and the T20E3 as the Medium Tank M27B1. This is rejected. |
November 1943 |
579 |
Production of 200+ T23 begins. |
January 1944 |
640 |
Ordnance receives permission to build 250 T26E1 beyond the first ten pilots. These tanks are re-designated T23E3 later on. |
21 Jan 1944 |
646 |
T25 Pilot #1 completed by Chrysler and shipped to Aberdeen. |
February 1944 |
671 |
T26E1 Pilot #1 shipped to Aberdeen for testing and evaluation. |
March 1944 |
700 |
T23 monthly production reaches 30 tanks that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
21 May 1944 |
767 |
Tests of T26E1 Pilots #1 and #2 completed at Aberdeen and Fort Knox. |
June 1944 |
792 |
Peak of T23 Production at 39 vehicles. |
29 June 1944 |
806 |
T26 series redesignated as heavy tanks. |
November 1944 |
945 |
T26E3 production begins at Fisher Tank Arsenal. |
March 1945 |
1065 |
T26E3 standardized as M26 Pershing. |
April 1945 |
1096 |
M26 monthly production reaches 269 tanks that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
June 1945 |
1157 |
Peak of M26 Production at 375 vehicles. |
Panzerkampfwagen III (3.7 cm KwK)Reference: Note: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
27 January 1934 |
0 |
WaPruf 6 given authority to proceed with development of a 10 ton weight class tank with a 3.7 cm gun. |
30 June 1934 |
154 |
Deadline for Daimler Benz, Krupp, MAN and Rheinmetall to submit designs for the new 10 ton tank. |
August 1934 |
200 |
Krupp completes two prototype 3.7cm turrets for the 10 ton tank. |
August 1935 |
565 |
First trial chassis completed by Daimler Benz. |
20 August 1935 |
570 |
Heer acceptance firing trials of the turrets. |
December 1935 |
687 |
Contracts issued for 0-Series Pilots. |
3 April 1936 |
797 |
Designation Panzerkampfwagen III (3.7cm) (Sd.Kfz.141) assigned to tank. |
May to Sep 1937 |
1204 to 1327 |
Pz III Ausf A production begins (Series 0 Pilot version). |
11 July 1938 |
1626 |
759 Pz III ordered for Accounting Year 1939 |
December 1938 |
1783 |
First Panzer III Ausf E (first mass production version) accepted by the Heer. |
September 1939 |
2057 |
Panzer III (3.7 cm) monthly production reaches 40 tanks that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
July 1940 |
2361 |
Peak of Panzer III (3.7cm) Production at 67 vehicles. |
Panzerkampfwagen V PantherReference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
17 December 1941 |
0 |
Previous plans by Germany for a 20-ton class tank (VK 20.01) (Vollketten = Fully Tracked; 20 = Weight in Tons; 01 = first model in series), canceled and new specification for a 30-ton class tank (VK 30.01) issued. |
3 February 1942 |
48 |
Wa Pruef 6 reviews and approves preliminary designs from MAN and Daimler Benz. |
11 May 1942 |
145 |
Special Commission unanimously decides in favor of MAN's proposal. |
13 May 1942 |
147 |
Hitler briefed on Commission report. |
15 May 1942 |
149 |
MAN informed that Hitler has decided in favor of their proposal. |
8 November 1942 |
326 |
Driving trials of experimental chassis begin. |
24 January 1943 |
403 |
First and second Panther Ausf D built arrive at Grafenwohr for testing, despite not being accepted by Waffenamt inspectors. |
May 1943 |
514 |
First actual Panthers accepted by Waffenamt. (February through April production was withdrawn and rebuilt, being included in the May 1943 totals). |
December 1943 |
728 |
Panther monthly production reaches 299 tanks that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
July 1944 |
941 |
Peak of Panther Production at 380 vehicles. |
Tiger IIReference: Encyclopedia of German Tanks of World War II by Chamberlain, Doyle and Jentz. |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
21 June 1941 |
0 |
Wa Pruf 6 requests that Porsche investigate whether it is possible to mount the 8.8 cm Flak 41 (L72) in the VK 45.01 (P). |
27 Sep 1941 |
98 |
Krupp and Rheinmetall receive contract to present Wa Pruf 6 with conceptual designs for a turret mounting the 8.8 cm Flak 41 on the VK 45.01 (P & H). |
April 1942 |
298 |
Henschel begins concept designs for chassis that can mount a turreted 8.8 cm KwK L/71. |
November 1943 |
877 |
Tiger II V1 prototype accepted by Waffenamt. |
January 1944 |
938 |
First production Tiger II accepted by Waffenamt. |
February 1944 |
969 |
First Tigers II issued to training units. |
June 1944 |
1090 |
Tiger II monthly production reaches 32 tanks that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. Also, first issue of Tiger II to combat units. |
August 1944 |
1151 |
Peak of Tiger II Production at 94 vehicles. |
September / October 1944 |
N/A |
On 22, 27, 28 September and 2 and 7 October 1944; a total of 2,906 HE and 1,792 Incendiary bombs were dropped on Henschel, destroying 95% of the floor area of the plant. Production dropped to 26 vehicles a month in October and November 1944 before slowly recovering in December 1944. |
Sturmgeschutz III (7.5 cm L/24)Reference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
8. Jun. 1936 |
0 |
Erich von Manstein lays out the tactical concepts for Sturmartillerie. |
15. Jun. 1936 |
7 |
Inspektorat 4 (Artillery) authorizes the Waffenamt to proceed with the design of a armored self propelled chassis mounting a 7.5 cm gun. |
By the end of 1937 |
571 |
Five 0-Series soft-steel StuGs produced. (precise dates not possible due to the Heereswaffenamt not keeping precise records before December 1938). |
January 1940 |
1316 |
First production series StuG III Ausf A completed. |
January 1941 |
1682 |
StuG III (L24) monthly production reaches 44 StuGs that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
October 1941 |
1955 |
Peak of Stug III (L24) production at 71 vehicles. |
Sturmgeschutz III (7.5 cm L/40+)Reference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
1 Aug 1938 |
0 |
Krupp announces that the conceptual design for a StuG with the 7.5cm Kanone L/40 would be ready by 20 August 1938. |
12 Jan 1939 |
164 |
Krupp receives official contract for the sPaK L/42. |
21 Jul 1939 |
354 |
WaPruf 4 orders wooden mockup of the 7.5 cm L/40 StuK. |
4 Nov 1939 |
460 |
Krupp completes wooden mockup of the 7.5 cm L/40 StuK. |
26 Apr 1940 |
634 |
Krupp completes pilot of the “lang 7.5 cm Kanone (Pz.Sfl.). (7.5 cm L/40). |
1 Oct 1941 |
715 |
“lang 7.5 cm Kanone (Pz.Sfl.). (7.5 cm L/40) accepted by Waffenamt after a testing program involving 133 fired rounds. |
19 Mar 1941 |
961 |
Pilot weapon displayed in StuG III at Daimler Benz for the Army. |
31 Mar 1941 |
973 |
Demonstration of StuG III with L40 gun for Hitler. |
20 Nov 1941 |
1207 |
Cancellation of 7.5 cm Kanone L/40 in favor of 7.5cm Kanone 44 L/46. |
27 Jan 1942 |
1275 |
Two 7.5cm Kanone 44 L/46 completed and ready for installation & testing. |
16 Mar 1942 |
1323 |
7.5cm Kanone 44 L/46 redesignated 7.5 cm Sturmkanone 40 L43. |
March 1942 |
1322 |
First StuG with 7.5 cm L/46 produced. |
July 1943 |
1809 |
StuG III (L46/48) monthly production reaches 281 StuGs that month; beginning of Peak Production Period. |
December 1944 |
2328 |
Peak of Stug III (L46/48) production at 71 vehicles. |
In June 1943, Guderian wanted a Mehrzweckpanzer (multipurpose tank) for reconnaisance, artillery observation, anti-aircraft, tank destroyer and SP Artillery on a 28 ton chassis.
In July 1943, Krupp's developmental plan for the Mehrzweckpanzer envisioned:
3 months to complete detail design.
6 months to complete a
trial vehicle.
3 months to test the trial vehicle.
8 months to
perfect the design based off trial results.
With series production beginning April 1945, a total of 670 days (or 22.3 months) to go from “idea” to Ausf A rolling off the lines.
References:
Panzer Tracts: No 20-1: Paper Panzers –
Panzerkampfwagen, Sturmgeschuetz and Jagdpanzer by Jentz &
Doyle
SBD DauntlessReference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
November 1937 |
0 |
XBT-2 ordered by USN to be a development of the BT-1. |
August 1938 |
273 |
XBT-2 Prototype completed. |
April 1939 |
516 |
USN orders 144 x SBDs, broken down as 57 x SBD-1 for USMC and 87 x SBD-2 for USN. |
June 1940 |
943 |
Marine Air Group One (MAG-1) receives first SBD-1s. |
November 1940 |
1096 |
USN receives first SBD-2s. |
March 1941 |
1216 |
Deliveries of SBD-3 begin. |
May 1941 |
1277 |
Completion of USN SBD-2 contract with all aircraft delivered. |
October 1942 |
1795 |
Deliveries of SBD-4 begin. |
May 1943 |
2007 |
Deliveries of SBD-5 begin. |
5 July 1944 |
2424 |
Last Fast Carrier Force SBD combat mission flown by VB-10 attacking Guam from USS Enterprise with SBD-5s. After this point all SBDs in service would be USMC ground based Dauntlesses. |
July 1944 |
2434 |
SBD production terminates. |
SB2C HelldiverReference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
May 1939 |
0 |
Navy orders 370 x Helldivers. |
18 December 1940 |
583 |
XSB2C-1 Prototype Maiden Flight. |
April 1942 |
1066 |
VS-9 receives first production SB2C-1s. It was planned for the SB2C to begin replacing the Dauntless in 1942, but due to teething difficulties, combat entry was delayed by a year. |
11 November 1943 |
1641 |
SB2C-1C enters combat with VB-17 on USS Bunker Hill with strikes against Rabaul. |
5 July 1944 |
1878 |
SB2C completely replaces the SBD in the Fast Carrier Task Force (FCTF). |
Prototype Authorization: 10
September 1939
Prototype First Flight: 19
August 1940
Production First Acceptance: 1
February 1941
First Combat Use: Not
Applicable due to Pre-War Development
Peak Production
Period: December 1942
Days from Authorization to First Acceptance: 510 days
Days
from Authorization to Peak Production: 1,192 days
References:
Joe
Baugher's Web Articles
Army Air Forces Statistical
Digest - World War II (Second Printing) (December 1945)
Army
Air Forces Statistical Digest - Supplement Number 1: 1945 (April
1946)
Prototype Authorization: 10
September 1939
Prototype First Flight: 25
November 1940
Production First Acceptance: 22
February 1941
First Combat Use: Not
Applicable due to Pre-War Development
Peak Production
Period: February 1943
Days from Authorization to First Acceptance: 531 days
Days
from Authorization to Peak Production: 1,254
days
References:
Joe
Baugher's Web Articles
Army
Air Forces Statistical Digest - World War II (Second
Printing) (December 1945)
Army
Air Forces Statistical Digest - Supplement Number 1: 1945
(April 1946)
Production Authorization: 30 June 1939
Production
First Flight: 16 September 1940
Production First
Acceptance: December 1940
First Combat Use: Not
Applicable due to Pre-War Development
Peak Production Period:
August 1942
Days from Authorization to First Acceptance: 534 days
Days
from Authorization to Peak Production: 1,142 days
Note: The A-20 was a redesign of an existing Douglas aircraft (DB-7) developed for foreign orders; so it's production timing is a bit odd.
References:
Joe
Baugher's Web Articles
Army Air Forces Statistical
Digest - World War II (Second Printing) (December 1945)
Army
Air Forces Statistical Digest - Supplement Number 1: 1945 (April
1946)
A-26 InvaderReferences: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
5 November 1940 |
0 |
AAF replies to Douglas letter of late October 1940 asking for prioritization on preliminary projects under development at Douglas. Douglas initiates informal and un-contracted design studies in response to letter. |
21 January 1941 |
77 |
AAF releases specification XC-220 for light bomber. |
27 January 1941 |
83 |
Douglas sends DS-536 proposal to AAF, for the construction of two types of aircraft, one a night fighter, and the other a bomber built to the XC-220 specifications. |
23 February 1941 |
110 |
Douglas proposes building 500 A-26s based upon DS-538B. Deliveries would commence 20 months after contract signing with the 500th aircraft being delivered approximately 3 years after production start. |
9 April 1941 |
155 |
XA-26 Mockup Inspection by RAF. |
11 to 16 April 1941 |
157 |
XA-26 Mockup Inspection #1 by AAF. |
19 to 22 April 1941 |
165 |
XA-26 Mockup Inspection #2 by AAF. |
2 June 1941 |
209 |
War Department authorizes construction of XA-26 (Attack Bomber) and XA-26A (Night Fighter) prototypes under contract AC-17946. |
9 June 1941 |
216 |
AAF Change order adds XA-26B prototype with 75mm cannon to contract AC-17946. |
16 June 1941 |
223 |
Douglas presents AAF with DS-539 specification for production aircraft. |
28 June 1941 |
235 |
AAF Contracting Officer requests new proposal for 500 A-26s from Douglas |
7 July 1941 |
244 |
Douglas replies with bid for 500 A-26s. Doesn't satisfy AAF. |
30 July 1941 |
267 |
Douglas resubmits bid for 500 A-26s. Douglas claimed that if the contract was approved by 15 August 1941, the first production ship would be delivered by January 1943, with fifty aircraft a month rates by September 1943 and the 500th ship by March 1944. |
31 October 1941 |
360 |
War Department approves Douglas bid for 500 A-26s as contract AC-21393. |
10 July 1942 |
612 |
First flight of XA-26 (Attack Bomber) prototype. |
10 September 1943 |
1039 |
First A-26B #41-39100 accepted by AAF. |
May 1944 |
1287 |
First four A-26Bs shipped overseas to 5th AF in PTO for end-user testing. |
June 1944 |
1318 |
3rd Bomb Group (L) evaluates the four A-26Bs in New Guinea. |
August 1944 |
1379 |
18 x A-26s delivered to 9th AF in the ETO, most of them to the 386th Bomb Group. |
17 September 1944 |
1412 |
First combat missions with the A-26 by the 386th BG in the ETO. |
December 1944 |
1501 |
Peak Production Period of A-26 Begins. |
8 May 1945 |
1645 |
In the ETO and MTO on V-E Day, five Bomb Groups had converted from the A-20/B-26 and another three were transiting. 11,000 combat sorties had been flown and 18,000 tons of bombs dropped for the loss of 67 aircraft. |
Prototype Authorization: 27
April 1939
Prototype First Flight: 29
December 1939
Production First Acceptance: 16
June 1941
Deliveries to Combat Units: Not
Applicable due to Pre-War Development
First Combat Use:
Not Applicable due to Pre-War
Development
Peak Production Period: June
1943
Days from Authorization to First Acceptance: 781
days
Days from Authorization to Deliveries to Combat
Units: Not Applicable due to
Pre-War Development
Days from Authorization to First
Combat Use: Not Applicable due
to Pre-War Development
Days from Authorization to Peak
Production: 1,510 days
References:
Joe
Baugher's Web Articles
Army
Air Forces Statistical Digest - World War II (Second
Printing) (December 1945)
Army
Air Forces Statistical Digest - Supplement Number 1: 1945
(April 1946)
Prototype Authorization: 24
August 1940
Prototype First Flight: 21
September 1942
Production First Acceptance: September
1943
Deliveries to Combat Units: 8
May 1944 (Operation Matterhorn units arrive in China)
First
Combat Use: 5 June 1944
Peak
Production Period: November
1944
Days from Authorization to First Acceptance: 1,117
days
Days from Authorization to Deliveries to Combat
Units: 1,353 days
Days
from Authorization to First Combat Use: 1,381
days
Days from Authorization to Peak Production: 1,544
days
References:
Joe
Baugher's Web Articles
Army
Air Forces Statistical Digest - World War II (Second
Printing) (December 1945)
Army
Air Forces Statistical Digest - Supplement Number 1: 1945
(April 1946)
Prototype Authorization: 24
August 1940
Prototype First Flight: 7
September 1942
Production First Acceptance: 19
September 1944
Deliveries to Combat Units: July
1945
First Combat Use: July
1945
Peak Production Period: Not
Applicable
Days from Authorization to First Acceptance: 1,487
days
Days from Authorization to Deliveries to Combat
Units: 1,786 days
Days
from Authorization to First Combat Use: 1,786
days
Days from Authorization to Peak Production: Not
Applicable
References:
Joe
Baugher's Web Articles
Army
Air Forces Statistical Digest - World War II (Second
Printing) (December 1945)
Army
Air Forces Statistical Digest - Supplement Number 1: 1945
(April 1946)
F4U CorsairReferences: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
11 June 1938 |
0 |
XF4U-1 BuNo 1443 ordered by USN under contract 61544 |
29 May 1940 |
|
XF4U-1 first flight. |
24 October 1940 |
|
XF4U-1 delivered to NAS Anacostia for USN Evaluation. |
24 to 24 February 1941 |
|
Final USN demonstration/evaluation of XF4U-1 at NAS Anacostia. |
3 March 1941 |
|
BuAer issues letter of intent to Vought proposing a production version of the XF4U-1. |
2 April 1941 |
|
Vought submits VS-317 for F4U-1. |
30 June 1941 |
|
Vought awarded contract 82811 for 584 F4U-1, with production to begin February 1942). |
1 November 1941 |
|
Brewster Aeronautical Corporation assigned as associate contractor for F4U production. |
December 1941 |
|
Goodyear Aircraft assigned as associate contractor for F4U production. |
25 June 1942 |
|
F4U-1 BuNo 02153, the 4th Production F4U-1, flies on it's maiden flight. |
15 August 1942 |
|
F4U-1 BuNo 02156, the 7th Production F4U-1, is the first Corsair to be delivered to the USN. |
25 September 1942 |
|
F4U-1 BuNo 02156 flown to CVE-26 Sangamon in the Chesapeake Bay for CARQUAL. These four landings and four takeoffs showed the F4U had severe problems as-is for carrier operations. |
26 October 1942 |
|
VMF-124 receives its first F4U at Camp Kearney, CA. |
28 December 1942 |
|
VMF-124 declared “operational”. |
January 1943 |
|
VMF-124 departs for the South Pacific. |
12 February 1943 |
|
VMF-124 arrives at Guadalcanal. |
14 February 1943 |
|
VMF-124 sees combat for first time at Bougainville. |
2 October 1943 |
|
VF(N)-75 begins operational patrols in F4U-2 night fighters at Munda. |
April 1944 |
|
VF-301, equipped with modified Corsairs with longer stroke oleos, makes 113 landings with no incidents on CVE 73 Gambier Bay as part of the second round of CARQUALs for the Corsair. |
16 May 1944 |
|
A USN Evaluation board concludes that the F4U is the best all around fighter available and suitable as a carrier aircraft. |
Prototype Authorization: 1
November 1951
Prototype First Flight: 25
May 1953
Production First Acceptance: November
1953
Initial Operational Capability: 29
September 1954
Days from Authorization to First Acceptance: 745
days
Days from Authorization to IOC: 1,063
days
F-15A “Eagle”References: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
June 1969 |
-205 |
Bidding Closed |
23 December 1969 |
0 |
Selection of McDonnell Douglas as contractor and prototype contract authorization. |
Sep 70 |
252 |
Preliminary Design Review (PDR) and Radar contractor selected. |
Apr 71 |
464 |
Critical Design Review (CDR) |
June 71 |
525 |
Avionics review |
[unknown – Given as June 1972 but obviously a typo] |
UNKNOWN |
Major sub-assembly tests |
Mar 72 |
799 |
Engine inlet compatibility |
26 June 1972 |
916 |
Rollout of First F-15 |
27 July 1972 |
947 |
First Flight of F-15 (71-0280). |
Sep 72 |
983 |
Bench avionics complete and first aircraft performance demonstration |
Dec 72 |
1,074 |
First airborne avionics performance |
Jan 73 |
1,105 |
Fatigue test to reach one lifetime, Static test 2 critical concluded. |
Jun 73 |
1,256 |
Armament ground test |
Aug 73 |
1,317 |
1g flight envelope |
Dec 73 |
1,439 |
Fatigue test to reach 3 lifetimes, and USAF evaluation summary. |
Mar 74 |
1,529 |
Equipment qualified; Category II aircraft and equipment in place |
Oct 74 |
1,743 |
Training equipment in place and fatigue testing reaches 4 aircraft lifetimes. |
Aug 74 |
1,682 |
External stores flutter and release |
Oct 74 |
1,743 |
AGE equipment in place |
Nov 74 |
1,774 |
Category I flight tests complete |
4 November 1974 |
1,777 |
First Production aircraft accepted. |
14 November 1974 |
1,787 |
First production aircraft delivered to TAC: TF-15A (F-15B) |
1 July 1975 |
2,016 |
First operational F-15 Squadron formed at Langley AFB – the 1st TFW. |
9 January 1976 |
2,208 |
1st TFW receives first F-15A (74-0083) “Peninsula Patriot” to the 27th TFS. |
October 1976 |
2,474 |
IOC Declared for F-15A/B with elements of the 1st TFW. |
27 February 1979 |
3,353 |
F-15C First Flight |
19 June 1979 |
3,465 |
F-15D First Flight |
September 1979 |
3,539 |
18th TFW at Kadena AFB, Okinawa receives first F-15C/D squadron |
F-15 pre-production aircraft flight test rolesReference: The Great Book of Modern Warplanes by Mike Spick |
||
Serial |
First Flight |
Function |
71-0280 |
Jul 27, 1972 |
Open flight envelope; explore handling qualities; external stores carriage |
71-0281 |
Sep 26, 1972 |
F100 engine tests |
71-0282 |
Nov 4, 1972 |
Avionics development; calibrated air speed tests |
71-0283 |
Jan 13, 1973 |
Structural test airframe |
71-0284 |
Mar 7, 1973 |
Internal gun, external fuel jettison and armament tests |
71-0285 |
May 23, 1973 |
Avionics tests; flight control evaluation; missile fire control |
71-0286 |
Jun 14, 1973 |
Armament and. fuel stores tests |
71-0287 |
Aug 25, 1973 |
Spin recovery, high AOA and fuel svstem tests |
71-0288 |
Oct 20, 1973 |
Integrated aircraft/engine performance tests |
71-0289 |
Jan 16, 1974 |
Tactical EW system, radar and avionics evaluation |
Prototype Authorization: 13
April 1972
Prototype First Flight: 2
February 1974
Production First Acceptance: August
1979?
Initial Operational Capability: 1
October 1980
Days from Authorization to First Acceptance: 2,680
days
Days from Authorization to IOC: 3,093
days
Prototype Authorization: 31
October 1986
Prototype First Flight: 29
September 1990
Production First Acceptance: 23
October 2002 (Raptor #10)
Initial Operational
Capability: 15 December 2005
Days from Authorization to First Acceptance: 5,919
days
Days from Authorization to IOC: 6,985
days
Prototype Authorization: June
1973
Prototype Handover: February
1976
Production Handover: 28
February 1980
Initial Operational Capability:
Unknown
Arleigh Burke DDG-51 ClassReference: |
||
Date |
Days from Start |
Notes |
May 1978 |
0 |
CNO forms DDG(X) study group to determine what the next generation of surface warships should be. |
August 1979 |
457 |
CNO directs that a design should be chosen to be authorized in the FY84 or FY85 program. |
October 1979 |
518 |
DDG(X) Program Office established in NAVSEA. |
December 1981 |
1310 |
DDG(X) redesignated DDG-51. |
February 1982 |
1372 |
Preliminary Design Started |
August 1982 |
1553 |
RFP issued for design contract + lead ship construction |
October 1982 |
1614 |
Proposals received and evaluated. |
November 1982 |
1645 |
DDG-51 named ARLEIGH BURKE |
December 1982 |
1675 |
Preliminary Design Completed |
May 1983 |
1826 |
Contract design begun to select lead shipbuilder in FY85. |
3 April 1985 |
2529 |
DDG-51 contract awarded to BIW |
6 December 1988 |
3872 |
DDG-51 Laid Down |
16 September 1989 |
4156 |
DDG-51 Launched |
4 July 1991 |
4812 |
DDG-51 Commissioned |
Midway CVB: 513~ days from being laid down to launched, 178~ days
from launching to commissioning, 690 days average total
Essex CV:
453~ days from being laid down to launched, 165~ days from launching
to commissioning, 617 days average total
Saipan CVL: 363~ days
from being laid down to launched, 371 days from launching to
commissioning; 734 days total (CVL-48 only)
Bogue CVE: 154~ days from being laid down to launched, 250~ days
from launching to commissioning, 383 days average total
Casablanca
CVE: 116~ days from being laid down to launched, 50~ days from
launching to commissioning, 166 days average total
Commencement
Bay CVE: 207~ days from being laid down to launched, 212~ days from
launching to commissioning, 418 days average total
Average CVE:
159~ days from being laid down to launched, 171~ days from launching
to commissioning, 322 days average total
Iowa BB: 942~ days from being laid down to launched, 153~ days
from launching to commissioning, 1095 days average total
South
Dakota BB: 744~ days from being laid down to launched, 215~ days from
launching to commissioning, 959 days average total
North Carolina
BB: 839~ days from being laid down to launched, 324~ days from
launching to commissioning, 1163 days average total
Alaska CB: 627~ days from being laid down to launched, 309~ days
from launching to commissioning, 936 days average total
Baltimore
CA: 502~ days from being laid down to launched, 256~ days from
launching to commissioning, 758 days average total
Cleveland CL:
457~ days from being laid down to launched, 240~ days from launching
to commissioning, 697 days average total
Fletcher DD: 212~ days from being laid down to launched, 152~ days
from launching to commissioning, 364 days average total
Allen M.
Sumner DD: 172~ days from being laid down to launched, 116~ days from
launching to commissioning, 288 days average total
Gearing DD:
196~ days from being laid down to launched, 133~ days from launching
to commissioning, 293 days average total
Average Destroyer:
193~ days from being laid down to launched, 134~ days from launching
to commissioning, 315 days average total
Evarts DE: 111~ days from being laid down to launched, 143~ days
from launching to commissioning, 278 days average total
Buckley
DE: 89~ days from being laid down to launched, 120~ days from
launching to commissioning, 214 days average total
Cannon DE: 158~
days from being laid down to launched, 88~ days from launching to
commissioning, 241 days average total
Edsall DE: 81~ days from
being laid down to launched, 136~ days from launching to
commissioning, 217 days average total
John C. Butler DE: 66~ days
from being laid down to launched, 116~ days from launching to
commissioning, 182 days average total
Rudderow DE: 69~ days from
being laid down to launched, 235~ days from launching to
commissioning, 304 days average total
Average Destroyer Escort:
96~ days from being laid down to launched, 140~ days from launching
to commissioning, 239 days average total
Gato SS: 238~ days from being laid down to launched, 109~ days
from launching to commissioning, 347 days average total
Balao SS:
224~ days from being laid down to launched, 148~ days from launching
to commissioning, 372 days average total
Tench SS: 111~ days from
being laid down to launched, 122~ days from launching to
commissioning, 221 days average total
Average Submarine: 191~
days from being laid down to launched, 126~ days from launching to
commissioning, 313 days average total
Average time from ordering to keel laying: 486 days
Average
time from keel laying to launching: 529 days
Average time
from launching to commissioning: 677.5 days
Total Average
Time from Keel Laying to Commissioning: 1,206.5 days
Average
Construction Rate (Keel Laying to Commissioning): 31.57 long
tons/day
Average time from ordering to keel laying: 184.5
days
Average time from keel laying to launching: 919
days
Average time from launching to commissioning: 626.5
days
Total Average Time from Keel Laying to Commissioning:
1,545.5 days
Average Construction Rate (Keel Laying to
Commissioning): 32.02 long tons/day
Average Construction
Costs: 193,800,000 Reichsmarks [2]
References:
[2] Bismarck-Class.dk (LINK)
Average time from ordering to keel laying: 213.4
days
Average time from keel laying to launching: 709
days
Average time from launching to commissioning: 784
days
Total Average Time from Keel Laying to Commissioning:
1,482.3 days
Average Construction Rate (Keel Laying to
Commissioning): 12.48 long tons/day
Average Construction
Costs: 92,735,000 Reichsmarks (for the three completed ships
only) [2]
References:
[2] Heavy Cruisers of the Admiral
Hipper Class: Warships of the Kriegsmarine by Gerhard Koop,
Klaus-Peter Schmolke
Average time from ordering to keel laying: 260 days
Average
time from keel laying to launching: 978 days
Average time
from launching to commissioning: 568 days
Total Average
Time from Keel Laying to Commissioning: 1,546 days
Average
Construction Rate (Keel Laying to Commissioning): 47.08 long
tons/day
Time = 32.69 * Displacement0.32
Where:
Time = Time from keel laying to commissioning in
days
Displacement = Full-Load displacement of the vessel in
long tons.
Notes: Suitable for things ranging from light cruisers to battleships.